Also having a copy of ANY stable firmware would help us "exit the loop" of proprietary updates that could break our hack. If we can track down a copy of firmware V1.03 or earlier, we can make the printer run bulk filament by changing materials in the header! Anything after that seems to calculate filament usage from the stepper or some such nonsense. Note that the header information in there IS required. Unfortunately, my Simplicit圓D file causes a filament error, despite the inits being totally identical. BFB from the CubePro software, and one I built by adding some init stuff to a Simplicit圓D output. I've attached my test part (CubePro software puts out absolute crap with this), a. There is a thread on CubePro GCode here: but it's not very methodical.You will see they are getting prints to run.ĥ. The latest version and the source is available here: !top. They did it with KISSlicer and a post-processor called Cubeitmod. A bunch of folks cracked the CubeX printer, which was the predecessor to CubePro. This has been reverse engineered and a handy utility called CodeX is available to convert to/from. CubePro requires a proprietary binary with extension. Simplicit圓D already supports BFB's 3D Touch printer, so that might be a good place to start.Ģ. These printers evolved from BitsFromBytes printers. I'm new to GCode but I'm highly tech-capable, in both software and hardware.ġ. I bought a license JUST because I believe it can be done. HOWEVER, this would be possibly the best printing machine under $20K if we can JUST use Simplif圓D. It's absolutely a deal breaker for a "prosumer" machine that is used for engineering parts that tend to be all uniform, thin walls - the resulting parts have very little rigidity. ![]() It will simply print parallel shells and refuses to crosslink. Specifically, the slicing engine.Īll other issues aside (and there are a few, for sure), the slicing engine that they use will not, under any circumstances, fill a thin vertical wall. ![]() I seriously believe that this machine has the potential to rival Stratasys build quality.Įxcept for one fatal flaw: their super, super crappy software. For the price/performance I'm even okay being locked into their exorbitantly priced cartridges. Simply put, the CubePro is a wonderful machine - beautiful, high build quality, rigid, large build volume, and heated chamber(!!!). I'm the disappointed and frustrated owner of a brand-new CubePro Duo, and I'm here to make it better.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |